Bravo, Stephanie Lee! Such a beautiful and brave investigation into the retraction. This new phenomenon of, “died suddenly,” is definitely due to climate change/cold or hot showers/exercise/eating eggs etc and these things-though we have done them for lifetimes, were simply lying in wait to make a perfectly timed, perfectly lethal attack on mankind. No need to look any further, as we must accept these, “sponsored by Pfizer,” approved, “peer reviewed” explanations and Stephanie Lee has no intention of exploring further. We have our answers, provided by Pfizer. As for any journal submissions that question that answer, well -we can just have that retracted and prevent any exploration into the flimsy, nontransparent reasons we use. Only a bigot, racist. white supremacist, anti-vaxxer would even ask, right, Stephanie? Meanwhile, pay no attention to the young kids and college students dying suddenly-that has always happened, bigot. In the word of our new Lords and Saviors, the mighty Pfizer, “did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.” Now, Stephanie, (as I am sure you did not care to look), that was Sasha Latypova describing the basis on which Pfizer requested the dismissal of a False Claims Act case brought against them for their covid vaccines. Like Pfizer, our esteemed peer reviewed publishers are simply providing the answers we like and demand. There will be no questioning of the approved narrative, and anyone who tries will be retracted- right quick. Then, they will bring in our reliable “journalists,” to write up a nice piece that fluffs the retraction, without exploring any of those pesky, nontransparent reasons they give us for why. “Journalists,” like Stephanie, who are content with that top layer of Pfizer fraud. The one we like and order. She can not be expected to dig any deeper. That would require her to actually investigate, and that is only for those racist, bigots-right, Stephanie?Great article, and since your Substack bio said that you are especially interested in stories that involve, “ethics and accountability,” I will keep my eyes open for anything that might interest you.
Bravo, Stephanie Lee! Such a beautiful and brave investigation into the retraction. This new phenomenon of, “died suddenly,” is definitely due to climate change/cold or hot showers/exercise/eating eggs etc and these things-though we have done them for lifetimes, were simply lying in wait to make a perfectly timed, perfectly lethal attack on mankind. No need to look any further, as we must accept these, “sponsored by Pfizer,” approved, “peer reviewed” explanations and Stephanie Lee has no intention of exploring further. We have our answers, provided by Pfizer. As for any journal submissions that question that answer, well -we can just have that retracted and prevent any exploration into the flimsy, nontransparent reasons we use. Only a bigot, racist. white supremacist, anti-vaxxer would even ask, right, Stephanie? Meanwhile, pay no attention to the young kids and college students dying suddenly-that has always happened, bigot. In the word of our new Lords and Saviors, the mighty Pfizer, “did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.” Now, Stephanie, (as I am sure you did not care to look), that was Sasha Latypova describing the basis on which Pfizer requested the dismissal of a False Claims Act case brought against them for their covid vaccines. Like Pfizer, our esteemed peer reviewed publishers are simply providing the answers we like and demand. There will be no questioning of the approved narrative, and anyone who tries will be retracted- right quick. Then, they will bring in our reliable “journalists,” to write up a nice piece that fluffs the retraction, without exploring any of those pesky, nontransparent reasons they give us for why. “Journalists,” like Stephanie, who are content with that top layer of Pfizer fraud. The one we like and order. She can not be expected to dig any deeper. That would require her to actually investigate, and that is only for those racist, bigots-right, Stephanie?Great article, and since your Substack bio said that you are especially interested in stories that involve, “ethics and accountability,” I will keep my eyes open for anything that might interest you.